In a recent article, Mark
Steyn describes contemporary Japan as a sort-of dystopian theme park
characterized by an “earnest childlike wackiness, all karaoke
machines and manga cartoons and nuttily sadistic game shows.” The
demographic meltdown in Japan has spawned a number of recent
articles, all attempting, more-or-less unsuccessfully, to explain
what has happened, why Japanese culture is dying, and what the island
will look like in 2040, 2060 or 2100. I guess this is one more of
those articles.
The arithmetic is
inexorable. The fertility rate currently stands at about 1.39 babies
per woman, a level from which no society has ever managed to recover.
Since 2006, there have been more deaths than births in Japan. In
2012 there were 212,000 fewer people than there were at the end of
2011. It may be hard to see in the cities, but rural areas are
depopulating rapidly. Small towns are empty, farmhouses are
abandoned, and wildlife has taken over areas that once were
developed.
Plummeting birthrates have
also created a “gray” society, where there are more adult diapers
sold than baby diapers. By 2040, the median age throughout the
country will be 55 years. (The median age in the retirement
community of Palm Springs, California is 52.) The collapse of
Japanese society will likely occur long before that, however. Any
young person capable of leaving Japan will do so rather than wait
around for the nation to become a nursing home.
Europe does not face the
same spectre of depopulation that Japan does, of course, because
there are people in France
and Belgium and Sweden and Italy who still have babies. They are the
religious ones. They are the Muslims. Sweden in forty years will
still have people in it, they just won't be blond and Lutheran; they
will have dark hair and they will worship in mosques. The difference
is immigration. Japan has none to speak of, so it is slowly
emptying. The cities remain full (and the subways), and the rents
are high. But the countryside is gradually returning to nature.
Where once there were farms, now there are forests, and brush, and
bears.
Japan
is different in other ways as well. Italians are not reproducing
either, but in Italy there is no sekkusa shinai shokogun, or
“celibacy syndrome.” Italians (and Swedes and Spaniards and
Greeks) still want to have sex. Young Japanese, however, do not.
No, really. They're mostly uninterested in sex, dating,
relationships, and everything connected with them. Really.
In
Japan, of those under thirty years old, 30% have never dated. And of
those unmarried people in the 18 – 34 demographic, 61% of men and
49% of women are not currently in any sort of romantic relationship.
Even among couples of child-bearing age, 40% of marriages are
categorized as “sexless” by the Japan Family Planning
Association, meaning that such couples “rarely or never” have
sex.
Why
is this happening? Well, while Japan is racing
toward extinction, French and Italians and Norwegians also are in a
death spiral from lower-than-replacement-level fertility, and
they will get there quick enough. (Trivia question: What is the most
popular name for a boy baby in Belgium? Answer: Muhammad.) And the
reason, wherever this is happening, appears to be the same. The
churches are empty. Atheists do not reproduce much. And who can
blame them? Without a transcendent meaning to life, what's the
point?
When
pollsters ask the Japanese about God, 70 – 80% of them say they do
not believe in God or any religion. This is an extraordinary number,
among the highest in the world, and it probably explains why the
Japanese face the worst, and most rapid, demographic meltdown. There
remains a tradition of Shinto and Buddhist ritual observance for
funerals and weddings and the honoring of ancestors, but these are no
longer religious practices, and God is not involved.
Here's
a theory on the death of Japan: it's our fault.
Until,
and during, World War II, the religion of almost everyone in Japan
was something we now call State Shinto, under which the Emperor was a
divine figure. Following the allied victory, emperor-worship was
abolished. It became a crime. Religious observance in Japan
declined rapidly, and apart from a very small number of Jews and
Christians and Hindus, belief in the divine largely disappeared. And
when the divine disappears, babies eventually stop getting born.
(The
foregoing is an absurdly oversimplified description of Shinto and the
kami, or “divine,” status of the Emperor, of course, but
the history is true.)
There
is no surer way to destroy a people than to destroy their belief in
God, and that is what the U.S. and Douglas MacArthur did to the
Japanese. The militaristic character of Japanese culture and
religion certainly had a lot to do with starting the war in the
Pacific, and we cannot blame MacArthur for crushing the institutional
worship of the Emperor after that horrible, bloody conflict, but a
more enlightened conqueror might have seen the wisdom in mobilizing a
post-war army of Christian missionaries to replace the beliefs that
were being banned. If Japanese people were Christians today, they
would be in churches, they would be having babies, and they would
still be here fifty years from now.
Copyright2014MichaelKubacki
Great article!!!
ReplyDelete