Friday, February 26, 2021

CORONA---The Politics of Hygiene Fascism

 

          Ever seen a commercial for “West Coast Psychics?”  For a buck a minute on the phone, they will tell you whether that new cute guy in Accounting likes you (spoiler alert: he does, but he might have issues so watch out), whether your 87-year-old auntie will die soon (sorry, she will), and whether you might get a surprise check in the mail in a month (thanks, Nancy Pelosi---like, who knew?)  Nobody ever gets told they will lead a dreary life, their plants will die, the cute guy will never notice them, and they will still have to slog off to work every day.  Accuracy, in such a business, pays no dividends.  Neither does understatement.

 

          The business of computer modeling for COVID is much the same.  We need results!!  We need something we can run with!!  If the fatalities are overestimated by a factor of ten, we can work with that.  We’ll find you the bodies.  But don’t tell us this will be just another flu.  That’s not what we’re paying you for.

 

          Bureaucrats of all sorts operate on the same principle.  If the worst winter of the last thirty years used 3000 tons of road salt, a bureaucrat will order 6000 tons this year.  The only danger such a functionary faces is from under-estimating the extent of a problem.  “Why didn’t you buy more salt?” he will be asked, but never, “Why did you buy twice as much as we need?”  More importantly, prestige comes only from the expansion of one’s mission, and budget, and staff.  There are no incentives for accuracy or efficiency or a hard-nosed assessment of risks and rewards.

 

          The biases are built in by the nature of systems that are not market-based, and thus carry few penalties for being wrong.  The famous Neil Ferguson, the UK’s Imperial College modeler, is a perfect example.  In 2005, he predicted 150 million deaths from the bird flu.  In fact, between 2003 and 2009, 282 people worldwide died from it.

 

          Nevertheless, when COVID came along, Ferguson’s prediction of 500,000 deaths in the UK and two million in the U.S. was instantly believed by PM Boris Johnson, who subjected the Brits to an unprecedented, horribly destructive, and pointless lockdown regime.

 

          Here in America, the really smart guys who govern us accepted the same apocalyptic forecasts without question.  It’s not that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a dope, or an evil man, but he’s not really a scientist either, or at least he doesn’t think like one.  He has been a government bureaucrat for 52 years; he has never actually practiced medicine or had a private-sector job.  It was absolutely predictable that Dr. Fauci would believe the most dire projections from computer models and make government policy based on those projections.  Subjecting children to a nightmare of isolation and sadness, driving tens of thousands of businesses into bankruptcy, and throwing tens of millions of people out of work---these are horrors that could never enter his calculus because of who he is, and who the bureaucrats at the CDC are.

 

          But it is hard for me to blame Fauci, or those like him, for the dark curtain of hygiene fascism that has descended upon most of America and many countries around the world.  We know who Fauci is, and the WHO is, and the CDC, and Neil Ferguson, and we have a pretty good idea what they will say and why.

 

          The true villains are those who allowed these public health bureaucrats to take over the world.  It was Trump’s job, and Boris Johnson’s job, and Angela Merkel’s job to listen politely, as they would listen politely to any and all howling special-interest groups, and then make rational policy decisions that take all aspects of the situation into consideration.  Their failure to do so brought us to the current state of affairs where masks continue to dehumanize us and lockdowns continue to destroy our society, yet no one dares to halt the madness.

 

*

 

 

          One aspect of the COVID mania that has continually amazed me has been the sheer persistence of the sense of terror.  Time after time I have expected people around the world to rise up, throw off their masks, open up their gyms and restaurants and schools, and demand their freedom.  In some places this has happened, or at least there have been attempts to throw off the yoke through street demonstrations and other signs of defiance, but it has been rare, and usually unsuccessful.

 

          The terror has been supported and reinforced in several ways.  First, the visual cues have been essential.  When you venture out of the house, you see people wearing masks.  They are everywhere, and it’s unnerving.  We have all gotten accustomed to it, but it will never seem normal (I hope).  Much like the required veiling of women in Muslim countries, the effect is to dehumanize the people whose faces are hidden.  In public, we are our faces.  That is our social identity; it is who we are and how others can know us.  And when it is taken away, so is our individual nature.  We become anonymous.  As social beings, we thrive on the sense of community with others, but the anonymity makes us impotent and afraid.   

 

          The masking requirements change frequently, and they differ from state to state and city to city, so it is always necessary to be aware of what the latest rules are.  Whenever you leave the house, you must think about where you are going.  Do I have a mask in my pocket?  Is there one in the car?  In addition, despite the end of the pandemic and the increasing difficulty in believing masks provide any protection, the requirements grow more stringent.  Ten months ago, I didn’t have to wear a mask at my job in a big-box store.  Now Pennsylvania wants me to wear one when walking through the park by myself.

 

          We have been in this lockdown/masking phase for nine months, though the pandemic ended in July for most of America.  Yet more people wear masks now than at the beginning, though evidence continues to accumulate that masking does no good, just as all the studies from the last twenty-five years told us.

 

          There are other visual cues, like signs on the doors of businesses, and social-distance stickers on the floor so you will know how far away to stand when waiting in line.  There is no escape from the constant reminders of the peril we all face.  In addition, the warnings over the PA system never end.  “Because of local regulations, you are required to wear a face-covering in this store.”  This message is repeated in my store every ten minutes.  At this point, is there really anyone who is not aware there are regulations?  The purpose of these constant announcements is not to educate, it is to keep the virus perpetually in the forefront of our consciousness.

 

          Then there is the hygiene theater, as it is now called.  In my store, there is an employee whose job it is to (ostentatiously) spray and “disinfect” each shopping cart before presenting it to a customer.  We have known for months that people get COVID through the air and not by touching infected surfaces or water fountains or doorknobs, yet the charade of wiping down and spraying the presumed sources of disease grows ever more elaborate and silly.  For me, the most distressing spectacle occurs when the store is busy, and rather than just grabbing an untreated cart, a customer will wait for the employee with the spray bottle to wipe one down for him.

 

          Then there is the relentless drumbeat of the “positive” cases, and the numbers of those in hospitals, and on ventilators, and the fatalities.  It is constant, on TV and on the radio, and in newspapers.  Today, all day, I heard about the grim milestone we have just passed---500,000 COVID deaths in America.  Based on CDC statistics, I believe the actual number is probably about 30,000, but we can have that argument another day.  The point is that nobody really knows how many there have been, and we won’t know for at least another eighteen months when we can see what the excess deaths for this period have been as compared to earlier periods.  That, however, does not stop the apparent celebration of death and fear by the news media and by the politicians and bureaucrats who have orchestrated this reign of terror, day by day.

 

          And perhaps the most insidious tactic is the constant shifting of the rules and edicts and guidelines that are imposed on us.  Can local restaurants admit 10% of capacity for indoor dining, or is it now 25%?  And what are the HVAC standards the restaurant must meet in order to seat you at all?  Can I invite 10 people to my house for a backyard barbecue, or is it 15?  And what about your daughter’s lacrosse team?  Is she allowed to play?  Are you allowed to watch?  And why should the rules be different in Pennsylvania than they are in New Jersey?  Is the “science” different over there?  It becomes almost impossible to keep track of all the state and municipal rules, and the effect can be paralyzing.  Only a year ago, it was easy to go to a restaurant, go to a ballgame, go to the library---all you had to do was show up.  Now, well, it often just seems like too much trouble.  And the ensuing isolation, and separation from our friends and neighbors, only reinforces the fear that now is supposed to guide our every movement, and every decision.

 

*

 

          It is a testament to the corruption and secularization of religious organizations, from the Catholic Church to our various forms of Judaism, to the innumerable Christian churches and sects, that there has been almost no pushback against the irreligious (and frequently atheist), government forces that have wanted to shut them down and have now found a means, in the “pandemic,” to do so.

 

          The First Amendment to the Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….”  Nowhere does it say, “unless there’s a pandemic.”

 

          Churches should be open.  There is no legal authority to restrict them or close them, and if priests and preachers and rabbis were willing to insist upon our right to assemble for religious purposes and be dragged from their pulpits and thrown in jail, I and tens of millions of Americans would be pleased to go with them.  But they are not.  They are cowards, and this is one of many reasons why the churches and synagogues of America are increasingly empty.

 

          And this is not just occurring in America.  The Pope himself bent his knee to the government hygiene fascists by altering traditional Ash Wednesday services.  Instead of impressing ashes on the foreheads of the faithful, he sprinkled ashes over their heads, maintaining social distance the entire time.  And this was done despite the fact that he and almost everyone else at the Vatican has already been vaccinated!

 

Copyright2021MichaelKubacki     

Friday, February 5, 2021

NFL PLAYOFFS 2021---SUPERBOWL LV

           For a while, there was a trend in popular history writing to tell a vast tale, often world history, via one particular and unexpected item, usually involving food.  There was a book called “Salt: A World History.”  There was “The Truth About Baked Beans: An Edible History of New England,” and “The Big Oyster: History on the Half Shell,” and “The Course of History: Ten Meals that Changed the World,” and “Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World.”

 

          It would be possible to write a similar tome about Tom Brady.  Maybe it wouldn’t cover the history of the world, but his story could certainly be used to tell the history of the NFL over the last twenty years, and maybe even a bit more than that.  It would be possible to stretch the Brady story into the history of America over the first bit of the 21st Century.

 

          It began with XXXVI, when Brady was basically unknown, but led his 14-point underdog Patriots to defeat the Rams.  Then there was XXXVIII, in which we all learned what a “wardrobe malfunction” is, and XXXIX, where Donovan McNabb puked on national TV.  His next win was in XLIX, which left us all with two questions: 1) why didn’t they call it Superbowl IL? and 2) why didn’t they just hand it off to Marshawn Lynch?  He then gave us LI, memories of which still cause Matt Ryan to awaken screaming in the middle of the night, and LIII, which was tied 3 – 3 at the end of the third quarter and is arguably the most boring Superbowl of all time.

 

          Then there were the three losses, in XLII, after an undefeated season, XLVI (losing AGAIN to Eli Manning) and the glorious LII, in which Brady set a Superbowl record with 505 passing yards but could not beat the sainted Nick Foles.

 

          QBs who lost to Brady in the Superbowl were named Kurt Warner, Jake Delhomme, Donovan McNabb, Russell Wilson, Matt Ryan and Jared Goff.  Mahomes won last year in his only Superbowl appearance.  His victim was Jimmy Garoppolo.

 

          Superbowl LV is unusual in that both starting quarterbacks have already led teams to Superbowl wins.  This has only happened on five prior occasions, three of which occurred back in the Pleistocene Era when the Earth’s crust was just beginning to cool and all the quarterbacks were named Starr or Bradshaw or Staubach.  The other two times both involved---wait for it---Brady.  In XXXXVI, Eli beat Brady to win his second ring.  Then in XLIX, Russell Wilson sought his second consecutive ring, but Tom Brady said no.

 

          All of which means what?  Well, maybe not much.

 

          In our all-important adjusted yards/pass, KC is a 7.4, and Tampa comes in with a 6.7 AYP.  Of course, Tampa has already beaten Green Bay (NFC 1-seed, 7.7 AYP) and New Orleans (NFC 2-seed, 6.8 AYP), so maybe Tampa is good enough in other ways to beat KC as well.  Their defensive AYP is slightly better than the Chiefs’ and they outscored their opponents this year by more than the Chiefs did.

 

          Brady and Mahomes have faced off four times and each QB has won twice.  All four games have been decided by seven points or less and KC has outscored Brady’s teams by 121 – 120.  In the most recent matchup, on November 29, 2020, Mahomes and KC beat Brady and Tampa Bay by a field goal.

 

          The game is being played in Tampa Bay and there will be about 22,000 people in the stands, which will probably be this season’s largest attendance at any game.  They will not all be Buccaneers fans, but this might actually be a 2020-21 game where the home field can make a difference.

 

          Everything I see about this game suggests it will be close.  Kansas City is favored by three points and I cannot say the line is wrong, but I will be taking Brady and the points.

 

Copyright2021MichaelKubacki