Monday, April 7, 2025

DUE PROCESS AND 5TH DIMENSIONAL TARIFF CHESS


         You can go for quite some time without hearing the term “due process,” but now I seem to hear it every day.  As ICE and other government agencies gather up gang members and soccer players and Jew-haters and ship them off to their homelands or distant prisons, the howled complaint always seems to be about due process.  “Don’t they get any due process?  Where’s their due process?  Whatever happened to due process???”

 

         In every case, the question that needs to be asked is not “Where’s the due process?” but rather “What process is due?”  Process is expensive and time-consuming, and different people are entitled to different amounts of it.

 

         I am a citizen of the United States and I was born here.  If the Philly District Attorney decides I belong in jail, I get a hell of a lot of process before he can put me there.  I get an impartial judge and a jury of my peers.  I get to cross-examine witnesses and see the evidence against me.  I get a lawyer to present my case and make arguments for me.  I probably get bail.  Even before any of that happens, the DA has to get an indictment against me and a warrant to arrest me.  And even if I’m convicted, I get to argue for probation, or maybe just a fine.  I can appeal my conviction to a higher court.  I can even ask the governor for a pardon.  I am DUE a lot of process.  I get process out the wazoo.  I probably get more process than a guy in any other country.

 

         The people getting kicked out of America don’t get nearly as much process as I do.  That’s how the law works.  They get due process too; it’s just that, for them, not much process is “due.”

 

         For one thing, they are not being convicted of crimes and put in prison, they are merely being sent away beyond our borders.  If the U.S. government grabs a guy from Syria who has been harassing Jews on a college campus and sends him back to Syria, he can step off the plane, walk into a restaurant in Damascus and get himself a nice plate of schwarma, falafel and muhammara.  Yeah, he’s not in NYC anymore but he’s not in prison either.  He’s free.  He’s just in a different place. 

 

         How much process is he “due?”  Not much.  Maybe he has not been adjudicated a “criminal” and maybe he was here legally on a student visa, but he doesn’t get nearly as much process as I do.  If he were arrested and the U.S. wanted to put him in prison, he would get a lot more process, but just to send him back to his homeland?  Not so much.

 

         Then there’s guys who are here illegally.  They have no legal status at all in America.  They may have been convicted of crimes here, or back in their home countries.  Or maybe not.  Regardless, they get nothing.  No process is due.

 

         The amount of process you get is based on your personal legal status and what the government wants to do to you.  What is unusual at the moment is that a lot of people are being deported and the Left is screaming about what is happening to them.  But the way the deportees are being treated, and the legal rights they are being afforded, is not at all unusual or troubling. 

 

*

 

         I’ve never been a fan of the idea that Trump plays 5th dimensional chess while the rest of the world is playing checkers.  He’s a player, and a strategist, and a negotiator, but he’s not an intellectual, and he’s not intellectually curious, and there are a lot of things about which he knows nothing.

 

         The 5th-dimensional-chess theory, however, is an interesting one.  And maybe I’m wrong.  Maybe he is secretly trying to achieve completely different goals from the ones to which he pays lip service.

 

         Let’s talk about his protectionist, tariff-based trade-war, for example.  On its face, not much of it makes any sense.

 

         Why impose a tariff/tax on bananas, for example?  How does it benefit anyone if I have to pay 20% more for my bananas?  Is there a banana industry here in Pennsylvania that is being strangled by those damn bananas growing all over Ecuador?  Then there’s blueberries and grapes and cherries.  They are all grown in the U.S., but not in January.  Why have tariffs on blueberries and grapes and cherries in January?  Why will I now have to pay a tax on them?  What’s the point?

 

         Then there’s all those manufacturing jobs that disappeared (for a lot of reasons) fifty years ago, but Trump now wants them back.  The world of cars and international trade is complicated, I suppose, but what about sneakers?  If we tax Nikes coming from Vietnam and have them made in Arkansas instead, we will be paying $500 for those Air Jordans instead of the $250 we pay now.  Those poor bastards in Little Rock are just NOT going to make sneakers for $100 a week, but the guys in Hanoi will.  So why not let them?

 

         In other words, even if Trump “wins,” much of this tariff war is pointless.  No one in America will benefit---not consumers and not the (mostly imaginary) US manufacturing workers.

 

         So maybe there’s another explanation.  Maybe there’s a 5th-dimensional chess game Trump is playing here and the trade war is just a means to a completely different end.

 

         The inflation that has crippled the American economy over the past five years is the result of the attempted globalist takeover during the COVID years.  The lockdowns designed to get Trump out of office necessitated the printing of trillions of dollars to create a fake economy while the attempted takeover was proceeding.  The increase in the money supply, along with further wasteful spending in the Biden Administration, inflated prices across the economy (and around the world).

 

         There are a limited number of ways to reduce inflation.  One is to “grow out of it” by expanding the economy without increasing the money supply.  Trump is trying to do that, primarily by expanding energy production, but the money supply has been so inflated that this method will take longer than Trump has in office.

 

         The other tool is to remove extra dollars from the money supply through taxation, and maybe that is actually what the tariffs are for.  If I have to pay $800 for a dishwasher rather than $600, and the extra $200 is simply a tax that the US government collects and then removes from the money supply, deflation occurs. 

 

         Trump has been so adamant about cutting taxes that he could never admit he is actually raising taxes, but he doesn’t have to.  He claims, and has always claimed, that it is the Chinese (or the Mexicans, or whoever), that pay the tariffs.  He says it so much that I sometimes think he believes it, but of course, the extra  dishwasher money is coming out of my pocket.  And money that comes out of my pocket and goes to the U.S. government has a name---it’s called “tax.”

 

         Economists who don’t know much about economics will often say tariffs are “inflationary,” but what they really mean is that tariffs tend to increase prices.  Everything that increases prices is not “inflationary,” however.  Killing 100 million chickens quadruples the price of eggs, for example, but it is not “inflationary.”  A lot of events can increase prices but are not “inflationary.”  Inflation is caused by an increase in the money supply.  Tariffs, since they are taxes, are a way of reducinginflation.

 

         And maybe that’s the only purpose of them. 

 

Copyright2025MichaelKubacki

 

                

 

                  

 

              

 

         

Saturday, April 5, 2025

MARCH THOUGHTS

 I write this blog on the ancestral lands of the Lenape, Susquehannock, Shawnee and Iroquois peoples, the traditional caretakers of this water and land and internet.  We honor and pay our respects to indigenous communities here and around the world.

 

*

 

On a t-shirt at Target worn by a 20-year-old guy:

 

 THIS IS THE ONLY SHIRT I COULD FIND

 THAT DOESN’T HAVE CUM ON IT

 

*

 

Since it appears unlikely there will ever be a serious investigation into the attempted totalitarian takeover of America via the COVID pandemic, I will settle for Trump issuing a (very public) Presidential Pardon for treason to Anthony Fauci for the crimes he committed in secretly funding the development of COVID-19 in Wuhan, funding gain-of-function research contrary to U.S. policy, lying to Americans about the nature of mRNA vaccines and vaccine efficacy, masks, social distancing, lock-downs, asymptomatic spread of the virus, the wisdom of lockdowns, etc.  It will be a lengthy declaration.

 

Also named in the Pardon would be Deborah Birx, CDC Director Rochelle Wallensky, US Surgeon General Jerome Adams, and various governors and state officials whose actions killed tens of thousands of vulnerable elderly people by exposing them needlessly to COVID.  This list would include Andrew Cuomo (N.Y.), Phil Murphy (N.J.), Tom Wolf (PA), Rachel Levine (PA), Gretchen Whitmer (Mich.), and many others.

 

This idea is not originally mine.  Hat tip to Capt. Seth Keshel.

 

*

 

The movie Hidden Figures (2016) is about the U.S. space program in the 1950s and 60s when much of the math was still being done by hand.  One scene depicts a meeting of the engineers and mathematicians a few days before John Glenn’s historic orbital flight.  Everybody in the room (especially Glenn himself), is concerned about the data from IBM computers.

 

Katherine Johnson is the only black person in the room, and when the meeting ends, Glenn tells the head of the unit, “Get the girl to do it.  I want the human computer to check the output of the electronic computer, and if she says they’re good, then I’m good to go.”

 

Glenn was not sure he would get in the space capsule.  Only when Katherine Johnson (who had to fight to get in the room), said it was OK did John Glenn finally agree.

 

For those of us old enough to remember that era, the scene rings true.  Then, if your path crossed that of a black professor or lawyer or doctor or some other professional, your first thought was usually, “Wow.  You must be good.  To get where you are you probably had to put up with an enormous load of crap.”

 

And that was Glenn’s conclusion as well.  He didn’t know anything about Katherine Johnson but she was not just the only black person in the meeting, she was a woman as well, so he assumed she had the sharpest math mind in the room and he was willing to put his life in her hands.

 

Today, the situation has flipped.  With affirmative action programs and DEI, you no longer assume that the minority person (unless he’s Asian), is the best of his profession.  Now, when you see a black doctor or a female pilot, you wonder whether they were subject to lower standards or received breaks in their training.  There’s always going to be a nagging doubt regarding their competence, especially if it’s a person to whom you are entrusting your life.

 

And it’s a stigma, meaning the doubt attaches to every professional from a favored minority group, including those who were straight-As, top-of-the-class, 800-SAT students.  If you’re black or female or Hispanic, somebody’s going to wonder whether you’re genuinely a star or whether you got some help along the way.

 

The stigma is one price we pay for a system that is not based on merit.

 

*       

 

“I have to have an orgasm a day with my macrobiotic diet, you see.”

--from “The Driver’s Seat,” a 1974 movie starring Elizabeth Taylor

 

Guys will say anything to get women (especially Liz Taylor), to sleep with them, but I suspect this argument does not yield a high percentage of coital success.

 

*

 

I don’t want to overwhelm you with the things I love about the new Trump administration, but I was DONE with affirmative action, DEI, pronouns, critical race theory, quotas, anti-racism and the rest of the “nice” racism twenty years ago.  I just never thought we would have a president with the guts to condemn it all and try to get rid of it.  I thank him for that.

 

I hate nice racism.  In fact, I think I hate nice racism more than I hate mean racism just because mean racism is almost impossible to find but nice racism still shows up everywhere.

 

*  

  

 

Trump has come in for plenty of criticism during his second term, and that is to be expected.  Haters hate---it’s what they do---and they hate him now no matter what he does.  When he shuts down secret government censorship agencies, and tells the EU they should allow free speech, the haters hate him.  When he finds people defrauding the U.S. out of billions of dollars, the haters decide they like the fraud and corruption.  When he makes a 13-year-old cancer victim an honorary Secret Service agent, they mock him for it, and they mock the kid too.  His efforts may lead to an end of the killing in both Gaza and the Ukraine, but even if he succeeds, the haters will never give him credit for it.

 

So be it.

 

I must respond to one aspect of the endless criticism, however, and that is the claim that Trump has “launched an assault upon the rule of law” or ignored court orders or violated the Constitution.  This charge is made by dopes as well as by sophisticated political observers.  It is even made by lawyers (which is unforgiveable).  All that is necessary to level this charge is an irrational hatred of Trump.  It is simply not true, and whenever I demand specific examples of this attack on the law itself, they are never forthcoming.

 

Trump does not defy orders from courts, no matter how ridiculous they are or how far they may go beyond the court’s legitimate jurisdiction.  When Trump issues an Executive Order relating solely to the executive branch of government, of which he is in charge, and the Democrats find a district court judge in the Northwest District of East Wherever who will rule that Trump’s Order can’t be obeyed, Trump does not defy it.  He never does.  There are plenty of us who think he should defy that order, that it is his duty under the Constitution to defy that judge’s illegitimate order, but he never does it.  He appeals it, and when that Trump-hating judge is reversed by a higher court, Trump wins.  But he never steps outside the legal lines.  Biden defied the law repeatedly. (Remember the student loan forgiveness the Supreme Court told him he couldn’t do, but then he did it anyway?). So did Obama.  (Remember when he announced there were laws he would not enforce even though it was his Constitutional duty to do so?)

 

Trump likes litigation.  Don’t ask me why, but he does.  He sues people a lot, and they sue him as well.  I’ll bet there was never a time in the last fifty years he was not on a court docket somewhere.  He uses the courts to get his way, he uses the courts to intimidate people, he uses the courts to exact revenge on people who have screwed him, and now he uses the courts to establish the lines of authority between himself and the other two branches of government.  But he has always acknowledged their authority.

 

Whenever Trump does something the haters don’t like, they say he is abusing his power.  But his power is enormous, and his power over the Executive branch is total.

 

The first sentence of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, states as follows:

 

“The executive Power shall be vested in a

President of the United States of America.”

 

And that’s it.  That’s all there is.  Judges have no executive power.  Bernie Sanders has no executive power.  Nobody else in the executive branch has any executive power unless the president says, “Hey, Elon.  Here’s some of my executive power.  Use it for a while to do some stuff I want you to do but then it comes back to me when I say you’re done.”  Sure, there are some limits, but just a few.  He can’t name the Secretary of State all by himself; he needs the Senate to “advise and consent.”  And he can’t bind the country to a treaty by himself either.  

 

Get it?  Donald Trump is not just some guy you don’t like, he’s also a frickin branch of government.  He is the executive branch.  So if he does something within the executive branch, like re-arranging one of the agencies or declassifying a document, or firing executive employees who are stealing government money and giving it to their friends, he can do it.  And any federal judge who claims he can’t should be removed from office.  Most of the (unelected) federal judges who issue these orders know they have no authority to do so but they do it anyway.  That’s why people like Obama put these partisans on the bench, so they will stop elected Republicans from doing the things they were elected to do.

 

As the Executive Orders, injunctions, and appeals pile up, a showdown or showdowns await at the Supreme Court.  And when the ruling comes down that the president has 100% of the executive power under the Constitution, and federal district judges have none, the dam will break and Trump’s orders will be carried out.  I’ll be doing the Snoopy dance that day.

 

*

 

This piece is being published on the 5th anniversary of the COVID lockdown going into effect in Pennsylvania and many other places.  I have written about trying to get one last drink at Billy Murphy’s bar on the day before St. Patrick’s in 2020, but finding they had already shut the doors.  Bars and restaurants closed across the state.  All of them.

 

I should have seen at that moment that the thing was a scam designed to induce panic and obedience in the populace.  Any ruling that Billy’s was somehow “nonessential” was obviously part of a massive fraud and an attempt to subjugate the free citizens of the Commonwealth, and I still regret that it took me another two weeks to understand what was happening.

 

What did it was the sudden about-face from all the Faucis and CDCs and WHOs, who simultaneously decided not only that wearing a diaper on your face would stop a respiratory virus, but that the only sensible thing to do was to force EVERYBODY to wear the diaper.  The giveaway was that there was no science to support this madness and there never had been.  They would publish some articles in medical journals a couple months later that sort-of said the masks worked, and nobody bothered to pick them apart and mock them though it was easy enough to do.  By that point, the terror campaign had worked and everyone knew there would be a heavy price to pay for questioning the madness.

 

That day, March 16, 2020, changed everything.  Those of you who know me are aware I am a political conservative, but I had always more-or-less accepted the role of politics and collective life in America.  Government built roads and bridges and collected the trash.  It set up schools to teach children the basic skills for life.  It protected us from criminals, or at least tried to.  If someone fell through the cracks and couldn’t take care of himself, the government would help.  Of course there was corruption and theft, and politicians were often egomaniacs, or immoral, or stupid, but some kind of government was necessary, and the people involved in it mostly wanted to make it work.

 

Then suddenly, on March 16, 2020, it all changed.  It was as if every important player in society suddenly saw this new virus as a way to take over the world and they all jumped at the opportunity to take our rights and our freedom away.  They closed the churches, schools, libraries, movies, and restaurants.  Public gatherings were banned.  People were separated from family members even if they were elderly and dying.  Any business that was based in some human interaction was shut down.  And any resistance to the New Normal was met with jail or fines or job loss or having your life disassembled.  And no discussion was permitted.  Dissent got you censored and silenced.  Conscientious doctors reporting (unwelcome) scientific conclusions lost their licenses to practice medicine.  Even the courts were mostly shut down so there was no place to fight the tyranny.

 

There was nowhere to turn.  Politicians relished their new power, of course, but all the anonymous, unelected elites who run our world also embraced the shutdown of civil society.  Academia jumped on board, and the news media, and social media companies and tech companies and insurance companies and medical societies and all the bureaucrats in all the government agencies.

 

And in addition to fulfilling their dream of ruling the world, most of them got rich in the process.  The fortunes mysteriously acquired by government people like Fauci and Schumer and Bernie Sanders (et tu, Bernie?) and all the media companies, and the ambiguously-named NGOs, shock us because we thought they were fundamentally good people rather than the thieves and grifters we now understand them to be.

 

Some of that has been stopped, and more of it might be.  We’ll never get our money back but maybe we can stop the fake economy they created with the printing-press money we had to pay for with years of inflation.  Worse is the spike-protein still inside the hundreds of millions who took the COVID vaccines.  Their lives will be shortened, their babies will die, and there doesn’t seem to be anything that can be done about it.  Even worse is that the same people are cranking up the machinery for H5N1 bird-flu vaccines---first for chickens, then for cattle, and finally for us.

 

Still, there have always been horrible people in the world and they have always done horrible things.  And while I was naïve to believe that the politics and institutions of our civil society were based in a benevolent impulse rather than greed and an insatiable lust for power, I have learned that lesson and I can live with it.  I will never trust a journalist again, or a politician, or a bureaucrat, or a so-called “scientist” until I obtain substantial proof they are not merely pursuing their own selfish agendas at my expense.  I don’t care how authoritative they may sound or how much I may want to believe what they are saying.

 

But the great sadness I feel on this fifth anniversary of 3-16-20 is not from the realization that doctors are no longer professionals but just functionaries who do what they’re told, or that government agencies have been captured by the industries they are supposed to regulate, or that Bill Gates wants to kill off a third of the world’s population.  What I can’t abide is that friends, neighbors, and family members gave in to the panic without a second thought.  They believed every lie they were told from the beginning.  The information was out there about masks and social distancing and asymptomatic spread and the dangers of the vaccines, and a large majority of the people I know never went looking for it.  Whatever Lester Holt or Jake Tapper or David Muir or Jimmy Kimmel or Joe Biden told them had to be true, and when they were told that people like me were dangerous and should be shunned, they did so.  (Even my doctors dumped me.)  And they still shun me. To most friends and neighbors and to all my extended family, I remain a leper.

 

I’m not expecting apologies.  I know it’s hard for people to admit they were fooled, but I think they are still hanging on to the propaganda because they can only justify their behavior the last five years if the COVID lies were true.  It’s called cognitive dissonance.  People will do any sort of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting to themselves they were duped.  And as long as there’s no official “COVID Commission” and as long as Anthony Fauci and Pfizer’s Albert Bourla are not in prison, nobody will be forced to face the truth.  We can all just pretend “mistakes were made” or it never really happened quite the way it did. 

 

But while I’m not expecting apologies, I don’t see how I can trust the people who crossed the street to avoid saying hello, or who, when they were told I was scum, treated me that way.  When the bird flu is launched, or whatever the next panic is, the people who dumped me will put the masks back on and stand on the stickers in the grocery store and get the new vaccines.  And I will again be the dirty thing who has to be quarantined or forced to get the shot or barred from society.

 

No thanks.

 

Copyright2025MichaelKubacki