Wednesday, April 29, 2026

MORE…MOVING TO VEGAS

 

I’m a long way from a major league ballpark and since I don’t have cable, I don’t even get a lot of baseball on TV.

 

However, I live across the street from Majestic Park, a city facility in Las Vegas featuring twelve beautifully-groomed softball fields with screens, shaded metal bleachers, home-run fences, enclosed dugouts, protected enclosures for cameras and radar guns, and scoreboards.  The fields are different sizes because the girls who play there (it’s all girls), range from ages four through eighteen.  It’s in use year-round, though I am curious about what sort of action I will see when the temps hit 120 degrees.  I am told there are international tournaments, and I don’t know that for sure, but there can't be a lot of girl fastpitch facilities like Majestic Park anywhere in the universe.

 

I have taken to going over there in the evenings.  I plop down with my discreetly-concealed beers and watch the young ladies.  They are well-equipped and everybody has a nice uniform (fitted, and not cheap).  From ages 12 and up, the girls have individual walk-up music.

 

As for the coaches, I’m sure there are good ones and bad ones, but there are a lot of them, and they are all seem serious about teaching their girls and bringing home the bacon.  I haven’t seen any crazy ones yet, and I haven’t seen a serious argument or shouting match either.

 

You can get a footlong hot dog while you are watching, or some popcorn or fresh donuts or a soda or fresh-squeezed lemonade, and they do not cost what you would pay at Dodger Stadium.  On a pleasant evening, after the sun has dipped below the mountains, contentment abounds for the casual fan.

 

The parents are extremely well behaved, which leads me to believe there are strict rules about acceptable parental behavior.  Most of the moms chat with a girlfriend or two, and some have babies they are tending, while the dads talk to a buddy and sip from their insulated opaque metal containers, much like I do.   Most of the noise comes from the dugouts where the girls are chanting and singing songs and trashing the opposing pitcher.  They ARE actually kids after all.

 

Don’t get me wrong here.  This is not the Mets and the Pirates.  A lot of routine ground balls wind up in right field.  But every now and then, you will see a pitcher who can move the ball around the strike zone and then get strike three on a fastball in the dirt.  I’ve also seen a little porkchop of a girl put together a 10-pitch at bat with 6 foul balls and wind up with a walk, and I thought, “Wow, you just did a baseball thing, didn't you, honey?”

 

I stay until my beer is gone and then I head home.  Lately, however, I’ve started taking more beer.

 

 

*****

         I have written about Las Vegas and its hundreds of housing developments, each featuring dozens of identical structures in identical color-schemes, each landscaped in red gravel (my house) or perfectly green, weed-free bluegrass (Steve Wynn’s house).  Each clot of condos or apartments or duplexes, or whatever, has a soft, multi-syllabic name denoting its existential tranquility, grace and deluxeness to any poor sucker who can’t afford to live there but who can read the name on the coyote-proof barricade surrounding the compound.  I live in Legends.  Other people live in Sandstone Edge or Desert Creek or Tucson Trails.

         The problem is that there are so many of these charming enclaves that real estate guys are running out of names.  If you accidentally copy some other developer, there may be trouble.  There may be lawsuits.

         That’s where I come in.  All you need to do in order to name your project is consult my list below.  Pick one name from column A, combine it with a word from column B, and you will have a unique appellation for your construction that no one will ever accidentally copy or steal. 

A                                  B

Scrotum                  Ranch

Pedophile                Estates

Spleen                     Conservatories

Prostate                    Manors

Uvula                        Overlook

Phlegm                      Village

Bile                            Canyon

Offal                          Vistas

Smegma                     Reserve

Dung                           Hills

Mucus                         Trails

Scum                           Acres

Putrid                           Crest

Grotty                           Pointe

Rancid                          Meadows

Bunghole                      View

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki

 

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

ACCOUNTABILITY AT SCOTUS—NOT!


         On May 2, 2022, Politico published a draft of the Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, alerting the world that SCOTUS was about to overrule Roe v. Wade and declare there was no federal constitutional right to abortion.  Immediately, there were illegal and frightening protests at the homes of Supreme Court justices.  A short time later, there was an assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh.

         The official opinion was finally released on June 22, 2022, revealing that the Politico draft had been stolen and leaked from somewhere inside the Court.

         Outrage followed.  All the justices (or most of them, anyway), were stunned that such a thing could happen in such a collegial place where everyone respected the traditions and values of the Court.  There would have to be an investigation!

         And did Chief Justice Roberts turn the matter over to the FBI?  Were all the law clerks and administrative people interrogated?  Were all their recent movements and contacts and phone records examined?  Were they given lie-detector tests?

         Uh…not exactly.

         Roberts turned the investigation over to Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley, whose job it is to supervise security at the court building, make sure the doors are locked and ensure that demonstrators don’t get too unruly.  There is no indication she had ever conducted an investigation before, and certainly not one of this importance.  Nevertheless, the Chief Justice chose Curley.  He would probably have been better off picking Moe or Larry instead. 

         On January 19, 2023, the court issued a statement that “the Marshal’s team determined that no further investigation was warranted” for the 82 employees they had questioned who might have had access to the Dobbs draft.  The Marshal had conducted “formal interviews” with all of them.   They all denied leaking the opinion and they all signed sworn statements attesting they were not the source of the leak. 

         Formal interviews?  Did everyone wear neckties?  Does “formal” mean you weren’t allowed to wear a t-shirt and shorts?  And what about the sworn statements?  Did Curley make them do a pinky-swear or just a regular swear?

         And that was the end of it.  No one was held responsible for breaching the centuries-old tradition of confidentiality at the Supreme Court and nobody ever will be. *

         What is infuriating about this particular dropped ball (one hates to call it a “cover-up” without more evidence), is that everybody who works on legal opinions at the Supreme Court knows who did it.  There are nine justices, each of them have four law clerks, and there are another 35 to 40 people who handle communications with outside lawyers and have some access to information about opinions.  That means this little guild consists of only 80 to 85 people.  They all know each other, they eat lunch with each other, they talk to each other about cases, they play basketball with each other, and they invite each other to their homes for dinner.  Justice Alito said in a 2023 interview with the Wall Street Journal that he “has a pretty good idea” who did it.  Of course he does.  They all do.  But this is Washington and nobody can be held accountable.  It would be rude.  People might talk about the leaker.  He might have trouble getting a multi-million-dollar job in a premier law firm.

         And now, largely because Justice Roberts would not hold anyone‘s feet to the fire for the worst leak in SCOTUS history, it has happened again.   Only now it’s worse.  Since everyone knows that a breach of confidentiality will not be punished, the leakers have multiplied.

         Two days ago, the New York Times published confidential memos the justices had sent to each other in 2016 concerning an Order from SCOTUS summarily halting Barack Obama’s climate change edict near the end of his presidency.  These  memos form the foundation of the arguments about the “Shadow Docket” the Court now uses to quickly reverse extra-legal orders of partisan District Court judges who rule that Trump policies be stopped immediately.  Allowing the orders of these rogue judges to stand would mean many months of delay before the appeal system could operate and a final ruling be issued by SCOTUS.

         It’s a completely partisan matter, of course.  The leftists on the Court knew Obama’s Order would have irrevocably changed US environmental policy before it could be legally overturned as being beyond his authority, and that was fine with them.  They wanted Obama to rule unchecked.  Now, however, they want illegal orders of District Court judges to remain in effect as long as possible and cripple Trump’s power to govern.

         That is why these leaks occurred.  The NYT and the leftists who work at the SCOTUS disapprove of the Shadow Docket and how it is being used to allow a fair hearing for Trump Administration policies, so they have stolen these documents and are trying use them as part of an “exposé” of the Court’s supposed deference to Trump.

         Good luck to them.  The problem of what should be done about illegal edicts by rogue judges or rogue executives will continue to be debated.  My point here is a different one---that the tradition of confidentiality and respect for the legal process has now disappeared because John Roberts didn’t care about it.

         Regarding the confidential memos from 2016, the NYT writes:

         “To better understand what happened next, the Times spoke to 10 people…who were familiar with the deliberations over the pivotal emergency order and who spoke on condition of anonymity because confidentiality was a condition of their employment.” (Emphasis added.)

         Ten people?  They didn’t ask twenty?  It is believed the Dobbs decision was stolen by a single person.  Now apparently, everybody will talk to you, at least if you are the New York Times.  It appears they can call up anybody at the Court and find out what Justice Alito said to Justice Thomas in the men’s room that morning.

         And it’s all because Justice Roberts didn’t bother to investigation the Dobbs leak. 

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki   

         

*I don’t think there is much doubt the leak of the Dobbs opinion was a crime, though that legal question may be arguable.  What is NOT arguable is that lying in the sworn statement denying responsibility IS a crime under 18 U.S.C Section 1001.  (That’s the statute they used to put Martha Stewart away for two years.)

 

Sunday, February 22, 2026

MOVING TO VEGAS: Observations About My New Home

 

“In Carthage, nothing that results in profit is regarded as disgraceful.”

                  ---Polybius, 2nd Century BC

 

“Much the same can be said of Vegas.”

                  ---Me, 2025

 

There are mountains here everywhere, hundreds of mountains.  I cannot go outside and NOT see mountains.  The closest ones are bare and rocky and desert-like.  In the distance they are snow-capped. 

 

         With the mountains all around, you also get a big sky that stretches over the entire basin that is Vegas.  Sometimes it’s blue from one horizon to the other.  More often, there are clouds tinted by shadows and sunlight into variegated streaks and puffs, and the colors change constantly in the afternoon as the sun drops behind the mountains.  It’s quite beautiful and I’m trying to enjoy it because I know it’s going to start to piss me off any day now.       

 

                                                      *

 

         In Uncle Vanya, or maybe it’s The Cherry Orchard, there’s a comic character who delivers a pompous dissertation on how much he misses his home.  “In Moscow, I had a nephew and a cousin; here I have nothing.  In Moscow, there are elephants at the zoo.  Here, I have nothing.”

 

         There are still times I feel like that guy.  In Philadelphia, I had naked mole rats and half-price burger nights at Murphy’s and good Italian rolls and people walking around dressed like Betsy Ross---here I have nothing.  Ah well….

 

         Moving to a new city you know nothing about is fraught with things you don’t know, and you don’t even know you didn’t know them.  Las Vegas, for example, has a highly competitive sushi restaurant scene with all-you-can-eat sushi available 24/7, with an infinite variety of rolls you’ve never seen before and fish species so strange that you are justifiably wary.   I had no idea. 

 

         But try to find a cream donut.

 

         The absence of cream donuts is something I never expected.  The angel cream (NOT Bavarian!), donut covered in powdered sugar is a guilty pleasure I became hooked on at the age of four.  They came from Hesh’s bakery on Castor Avenue in NE Philly, a bakery that disappeared late in the 20thCentury.  But there were plenty of other bakeries that made cream donuts, including Dunkin and Krispy Kreme, and I’ve been eating them for the last seventy years.

 

As the fashion for “health food” began to spread across the fruited plain, my angel cream donuts became less and less morally acceptable, and I began (without consciously deciding), to sneak them.  Few of my friends have ever seen me eat a cream donut.  Even my wife is not aware of the full extent of this lechery because I would often grab one at Shoprite and inhale it before I got home with the rest of the groceries.  I told myself I was sparing her the spectacle of my consumption.  She doesn’t care to see food on my face and there’s no way to consume a cream donut without plastering your mug with powdered sugar, so I was doing her a favor.  You see that, right?  But it wasn’t true.  I was hiding my cream donut vice from her.  And now, in Vegas, I am unable to indulge at all.  Karma, dude.  It’s a bitch.

 

                                                      *

 

         For someone who has spent years driving the streets of Philadelphia, Las Vegas is a surprise.

 

         We live in a residential area characterized by a grid of 4-lane streets that intersect at 4-way stop signs.  People stop at these signs; they don’t roll through them.  Everybody actually stops.  In fact, if someone gets to their sign a half second before you, they will often sit there and let you go first.  Being from Philly, I at first thought they were idiots.  Then I realized they were being polite and obeying traffic laws.  Imagine that.

 

         I also don’t see cars driving six inches behind my bumper.  And if you have the right of way, nobody cuts in front so you are forced to brake.

 

         I am told people do dangerous things on the road downtown and near the casinos, especially after dark, and I don’t doubt there are crazy drunks in Las Vegas, but I don’t drive around the casinos late at night, so I never see them.

 

         I attribute driving manners at least partly to the fact that Nevada is a “constitutional carry” state where a lot of normal people are packing, versus Philadelphia where most people who are armed are criminals because it’s so difficult for good citizens to carry a weapon legally.  People tend to be more polite in a place like Vegas because there are so many guns on decent people’s hips.  You would rather not piss anyone off.

 

                                                      *

 

         The cultural differences, like driving patterns, are the things you notice first when you move to a different city.  Smoking, for example. There is more indoor smoking here because it is permitted in casinos and everyplace with a bank of slot machines is considered a sort of casino.  Smoking is not as common as it was, of course, so you never encounter a smoke-filled room, even in Vegas, but I do like the smell of cigarette smoke when I encounter it.  I think I still miss smoking from when I stopped twenty years ago.  To me, the smell will always say “party.”

 

                                                      *

 

         There’s also more water-carrying in Las Vegas than I’m accustomed to.  I have generally regarded people who carry a drinking liquid around with them with something less than esteem and respect.  When I visited Joshua Tree, California this summer, where the daytime temperature was 110 degrees, my views on water-carrying changed a bit, and I now carry my own water in an insulated container.  I’m not proud of it, and it’s not 110 degrees here, so I have no excuse.  I often forget to take my water with me so maybe I’m conflicted.  Am I forgetting my water bottle on purpose?  Subconsciously?  I mean---who the hell am I?

 

                                                      *

 

         There’s no recycling here.  I wouldn’t know how to recycle my beer cans if I wanted to, though I assume there is a city program of some kind because they exist everywhere.  People in the West routinely see vast expanses of nothing and conclude, quite reasonably---well, why can’t we just bury our beer cans in the desert?  I suspect nobody west of the Mississippi was ever persuaded by the we’re-running-out-of-landfills scam of that EPA guy in 1990.  They see that the world consists of little towns here and there, and then there are mountains and deserts and billions of acres of nothing, so the idea of recycling to save the planet just seems silly. 

 

                                                      *

 

         Then there’s bicycle culture, and I apologize for injecting politics into this purely observational piece but it’s difficult to avoid when the subject of bicycles must be discussed.  I confess I have strong feelings about members of the Bike Path Left, the maniacal partisans who often bear “SHARE THE ROAD” tattoos on their thighs and buttocks, who almost elected Howard Dean president in 2004, who only care about bikes and bike lanes, and who are only dimly aware of issues such as inflation, immigration, war, LGBT rights, the climate, and drug policy.  I like the Bike Path Left less than I like communists, and I don’t like communists very much.

 

         I’m intimately familiar with them from Philadelphia, of course, where they have dragooned hundreds of miles of city street acreage for lanes that may be traversed by two bikes per hour but collectively render the entire city undriveable by cars.  The streets of downtown Philly were largely laid out in the 18th Century, so they weren’t very wide to begin with.  Now, laced with bike lanes, they are half the size they once were. 

 

         We have hundreds of miles of bike lanes here in Vegas as well because---well, you know, because of climate change---but most streets in quiet residential neighborhoods are four (or even six), lanes wide, so the bike lanes are not nearly as annoying.  They are even more ridiculous, however, because except for an hour or two per week, they are never used.

 

         Though there is little point in Philly to cutting streets in half for bike lanes that serve no real purpose in moving people around, there are people who use them.  It is possible to commute by bicycle from 10th and Wolf to your job in City Hall and there are probably three people who do that. Therefore, if you are a member of the Bike Path Left, those three people fully justify the $600 billion Philly has spent on bike lanes.

 

         But nobody does that in Vegas.  For one thing, you probably live on Lone Mountain Drive and your job is at the Red Rock Casino eighteen miles away, and you must wear your uniform to work, and for long stretches throughout the year, the ambient temperature is 106 degrees F.  NOBODY rides a bike to work in Vegas.

 

         So who uses the thousands of miles of bike lanes in Las Vegas?

 

          The only time I see anyone on a bike is on Saturday morning when a crew of ten or twelve will pedal past you, all in their multi-colored Italian spandex.  Then, by noon, they’re home again and the streets offer nothing but cars for another week.

 

         Still, you know…climate change. 

 

                                                      *

 

         A large proportion of residential housing in Las Vegas, including where we live, is found in gated communities with walls around them, making these communities difficult to distinguish from minimum-security prisons.  There are hundreds of them, and they all have names designed to impress you with their all-consuming elegance.  Here’s a few:

         Enclave at Gold Rush

         Legends

         El Capitan Ranch

         Durango Reserve

         The Pueblo

         Stone Canyon

         Mariposa

         Timberline

         Big Horn

         Desert Trace

         Desert Creek

         Copperhead Estates

Painted Desert

         Sandstone Edge

         Stone Canyon

         Mar-a Lago

         Cambria

         Deerbrooke Estates

         Cranston Ranches Estates

         Tucson Trails

         Grandview

         Panorama

 

         They are beige.  The buildings and the walls are beige, and all the houses and condos are surrounded by the same red gravel, which comes from the Red Rock Canyon just outside of town.  Millions of years created an iron-rich sandstone, and the red is from the rusting of the iron in the stone.   Instead of lawns, there are 83 trillion tons of this red gravel on the ground in Las Vegas.  Pretty at first, then monotonous.

 

                                                      *

 

         Cheap in Vegas: limes (but not lemons), avocadoes, booze, peppers, and beer.

 

         Very expensive in Vegas (or impossible to find):  Russian or Eastern European foods, tarragon (and other fresh herbs), and the nutmeg-adjacent spice called mace.  Pork costs at least twice as much as it does in Philly.  And I haven’t found a good loaf of bread.

 

                                                      *   

 

         I got a library card here shortly after I arrived and, after living in Philly, was more than a little surprised by the rules and procedures.  Late returns ARE NOT TOLERATED.  For the evil-doers, there is a frightening array of fines, assessments, loss of privileges, and a “collection agency service fee.”  I think eventually they send you to Guantanamo. 

 

         I always thought it was a mistake when the Free Library of Philadelphia abandoned late fees, and I think I was proven correct a few years later when shoplifting was also de-criminalized.  Now, in Philly, most felonies are simply overlooked, and it is sort-of impolite even to mention them.  It’s a slippery slope IMHO, and it starts with the elimination of overdue book fees.

 

                                                      *

 

         Music you hear frequently on classic rock stations in Las Vegas but never in Philadelphia: Meat Loaf.

 

         Music you hear frequently on classic rock stations in Philadelphia but never in Las Vegas: The Beatles.

 

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki

Monday, February 2, 2026

2026 NFL Playoffs—The Superbowl

 

New England vs. Seattle (-4.5)

 

         It remains my position that the most important quality of teams that get to, and win, the Superbowl, is an ability to complete long passes.  It can help to have an effective running back and it can help to have a competent defense (especially a pass defense), but neither of these features offer any value as a predictor of the team that will take home the Lombardy Trophy.  Year after year, however, the teams that go deepest into the playoffs are those that can throw the ball downfield.  This is why the guys who win the Superbowl MVP trophy are usually named Simms, Elway, Warner, Rodgers, Brees, Montana, Manning, and Bradshaw, with a few guys named Rice, Branch, Swann, and Biletnikoff thrown in.  O.J.?  Nah.  Barry Sanders?  Nope.  There are a few running backs on the list but the last one was Terrell Davis in 1998.

 

         By this measure, the best AFC team this year was the Patriots.  Buffalo had an argument for a while, but the final Adjusted Yard/Pass (AYP) for the Patriots was 8.1, the best in the league.

 

         In the NFC, the Rams and the Packers both challenged Seattle for the AYP crown, but the Seahawks kept getting better while L.A. and Green Bay faded.  The Seahawks are now clearly the best the NFC can offer.

 

         This is the correct Superbowl.  New England and Seattle are the two best teams.  And by my reckoning, the Patriots are a wee bit better.

 

         The most important number to consider is offensive AYP, where the Patriots prevail by 8.1 to Seattle’s 6.9.  Though less important, Seattle’s defensive AYP is better (4.5 to 5.7), reflecting the fact of Seattle’s superior pass defense, which may be the best in the NFL.

 

         Other measures are close.  Each team is 7-0 in blow-outs, defined as a win by 11 or more points.  Also, each has a double-digit average margin of victory over the course of their full season.

 

         With the Patriots superior in my numbers, and the Seahawks favored by 4.5, I must take New England here.

 

         It is tempting to look at the Conference Championship games and make too much of the QB performances.  Drake Maye, against an inspired Denver defense and very unpleasant Denver weather, went 10/21 for 86 yards with no interceptions.  He was terrible.  Sam Darnold, on the other hand, had one of his best games of the season, going 25 for 36 for 346 yards (and no INTs) against the Rams.

 

         However, when we compare these QBs based on their overall season performances, well…there’s no comparison.  Each man played every game for his team in 2025-6, and Darnold had a very nice year, with a 7.0 AYP and a 99.1 NFL QB rating.  But Maye’s AYP was a full yard more (8.0), he had six fewer interceptions than Darnold, and he achieved a 113.5 NFL QB rating.

 

         In 2025-6, Drake Maye put up the best stats of any quarterback in the NFL but, for some reason, the Rams’ Matthew Stafford is considered THE superstar and Maye is viewed as “just some guy.”

 

         I refuse to write off the entire season because of how Maye performed in dreadful conditions on January 25th.  The Pats win.  The Pats are back.

 

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

2026 NFL PLAYOFFS---Conference Championships


         I expect both Conference Championship games will be blow-outs and will lead to a Seahawks-Patriots Superbowl.

 

New England @ Denver (+5.5)

 

         New England is the best team in the AFC playoff list and Denver is the worst.  Adjusted yards/pass (“AYP”), for the Pats was 8.1 this season; for the Broncos it was 5.5.  New England was 7-0 in blow-outs this year and Denver was only 3-1.  While it is true the Pats will be forced to do their dirty work in the unfriendly confines of Mile High Stadium, they are 8-1 on the road this year.

 

         I’m deeply annoyed Bo Nix got totaled last Saturday because it means the Pats will be laying two or three points more than they otherwise would have.  Nix is not the reason the Broncos got to the playoffs and there is no reason to think they will be a worse offensive team with Jarrett Stidham over center.  Denver might be better off with what’s-his-name, who hasn’t thrown an NFL pass since 2023, but I still have to lay the extra points.

 

         The Broncos could bring back John Elway for all I care.  The Pats win, and easily.  Lay the points.

 

L.A. Rams @ Seattle (-2.5)

 

         The Rams are 8-0 in blow-outs this year and the Seahawks are 7-0.  In terms of all the important numbers, these are the two best teams in the NFC by a substantial margin.  The Rams even have a slightly superior AYP (7.2 to 6.9), though Seattle’s pass defense is significantly better, statistically.  These teams played each other twice, and each won a close game at home.

 

         But that was then and this is now.

 

         The LA. Rams have now won two games in these playoffs and haven’t covered yet.  I hate teams like that, don’t you?  But that’s not why I’m predicting a rout here.  It’s because the Seahawks are getting better every week and the Rams continue to go backwards.

 

         The Seahawks were good enough to take the Wildcard Weekend off and then crush the 49ers 41-6.  The Rams, by contrast, played the two worst teams in the NFC playoff roster and eked out 3-point wins against each.

 

         L.A. has survived by outscoring opponents, but the margins keep getting smaller.  They have given up 27 ppg over their last eight games while Seattle, over the same period, has given up only 13 ppg.  Over the same stretch, going back to November, the Seahawks’ margin of victory was more than two touchdowns per game, while the Rams’ was only 6.5 points.

 

         I am surprised the line here is only 2.5 points.  A more realistic spread would be 7.  Take the Seahawks and lay the points.

 

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki  

Saturday, January 17, 2026

“NAME THREE”—On the Existence and Identification of Imaginary People

 

         I was writing an article about the cultural changes I experienced moving from Philadelphia to Las Vegas, and at one point, I discussed the practice of carrying water around wherever you go because this particular practice differs somewhat in the two cities.  And as I delved deeper and deeper into the phenomenon, I used the word “retards” to describe a certain group of people.

 

         Before I publish these things online, I usually have my wife review them for typos, grammatical blunders, logical gaps, and other features that may discomfit or annoy my reading public.  On this occasion, she strongly suggested I not use the term “retards” to characterize the people I was describing.  She said it was an ugly term for the cognitively disabled and would put off some of my readers.

 

         “But nobody uses the word that way anymore,” I said.  “It doesn’t mean cognitively disabled.  It means a dope or a low-class boob.”

 

         “But there are still people who would be annoyed because you’re supposed to say neurodivergent or something.  Some people will be offended.”

 

“Name three,” I said.

 

I’ve been doing this for a while now.  Whenever I hear there are a lot of people who think something or did something, or believe something, or will do something, I ask myself whether I know any such people.  I am acquainted with a fair number of people, probably in triple digits, and if I can’t think of somebody I know who might fit the imagined profile, I often conclude that such people don’t exist.

 

It started with Obama in the 2008 election.  I remember being told Obama would have trouble in the election because of all the people who wouldn’t vote for him because he is black.  After I heard this a few times, I realized I didn’t know anybody like that.  So I started asking, “Who?  Name three.” And nobody could name even one. 

 

It’s hard to imagine such a person, actually.  Plenty of people didn’t vote for Obama, but refusing to vote for Obama “because he is black” means that a person would have voted for him if he were white.  In other words, this is someone who voted for Mondale and Dukakis and Bill Clinton and Gore and Kerry, but when Obama came along, they refused.  “Vote for a Negro?  Are you kidding? No way!”  In a nation of a third of a billion people, you can’t say there’s nobody who fits the criteria, but there can’t be more than a handful and they couldn’t affect the results of an election.

 

(Going back into American history, and not very far back, there probably were such people.  In the 1960s, racist Southern Democrats could be persuaded to vote for a Northern liberal like JFK or Hubert Humphrey, but if someone like Jesse Jackson had been nominated by the Democratic Party, Southern Democrats would not have gone along.  Those folks are long gone.)

 

More recently, I have been fed the same line about Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.  There are just too many Americans, I am told, who won’t vote for a woman.  Again, I say: name three.

 

There are certainly Democrats who stayed home and didn’t vote for Hillary or Kamala, but does that mean they wouldn’t vote for a woman?  No.  It means they wouldn’t vote for those women, who are arguably the worst Democratic candidates in at least the last century.  I could go into more detail about their manifest flaws, but this is not about Hillary or Kamala or Obama, remember?  It’s about using the word “retard” to describe people who have no real physical or mental impairment but are nevertheless, you know, retarded.  And my position is that nobody is offended by the term retarded because nobody uses that term to describe someone with a physical or mental disability.  “Retarded” just doesn’t mean that anymore.  Today “retarded” only means things like driving your car, alone, with an N-95 mask on.

 

The meaning of words changes over time.  “Zounds” and “gadzooks,” both of which refer to the wounds inflicted on Jesus Christ, were fairly powerful cuss words at one time, and now they are archaic joke words like cowabunga.  “Retarded” has a history as well.  At one time, “idiot” and “moron” were clinical terms used to describe different levels of cognitive disability, but they lost any clinical meaning and became silly insults used by The Three Stooges and others.  “Retarded” replaced them because it was thought to be a more elegant and gentle and descriptive term.  Now “retarded” has become a joke too.

 

And it’s only a joke.  No one is truly offended by it anymore.  My definitive proof came recently when Donald Trump called Minnesota Governor Tim Walz a retard.  There was enormous pushback to this remark by Democrats and the press and other Trump-haters, but none of it was based in the use of the word itself.  Instead, the response was a straight denial of the charge.  Tim Walz is not a retard, they said.  Trump is the retard.  Renaming the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts the “Donald Trump and John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts”---now there’s the retard. In other words, though the response to Trump’s insult was outrage, the responders nevertheless accepted the modern meaning of “retard” and “retarded.”  Everybody accepts it---right, left, Trump-lovers, Trump-haters, the woke, and the unwoke.  Even retards.

 

Copyright2026MichaelKubacki