Consider the following:
·
The Department of Justice refuses to seek
statutory minimum sentences in criminal drug cases though it is required to by
law.
·
The Little Sisters of the Poor are forced by the
government to pay for abortions.
·
Hundreds of self-proclaimed “sanctuary cities,”
which refuse to enforce federal immigration laws, are ignored by Obama, the DOJ
and ICE, and face no repercussions.
·
Members of the New Black Panther Party, in
uniform and brandishing nightsticks, intimidate white voters on Election Day in
2008. The DOJ, though it knows the
individuals and has photos of the crime, refuses to prosecute.
·
Secretly, and without warrants, the
Administration gathers phone records of staff at the Associated Press.
·
The Obama Administration, through the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, arranges for thousands of guns to be sold to
Mexican drug criminals, resulting in the violent deaths of hundreds of innocent
Mexican nationals and at least one US border agent, then refuses to comply with
Congressional subpoenas seeking information about the project. The US prosecutes no one for the illegal gun
sales or the subsequent murders.
·
Christian and conservative groups applying for
501(c) (4) status are harassed for years by IRS agents, who then resist
Congressional scrutiny of their actions.
No one is prosecuted.
·
After Obamacare is passed, hundreds of executive
“waivers” (with no basis in the statute), are issued to unions, friends of the
Administration and Democratic campaign contributors so that the most burdensome
provisions fall only on groups Obama does not like or which have no insider
status with his Administration.
·
Amnesty is unilaterally granted, by executive
order, to large numbers of illegal immigrants, ignoring current law.
·
“Operation Choke Point” is set in motion, where
various government agencies, without any statutory authority, force banks to
choke off access to financial services for businesses the Administration disapproves
of, like those who sell ammunition or make payday loans.
·
Following a military coup in Egypt, the
Administration continues to provide aid to the Egyptian government even though
it is prohibited from doing so.
·
Four Americans overseas are intentionally killed
in counterterrorism operations without any judicial process.
·
The Administration unilaterally changes
long-established bankruptcy law by giving unsecured creditors superior status
to secured creditors in the Chrysler bankruptcy.
·
Following the receipt of large campaign
contributions for Obama from executives at Solyndra, the Administration awards
$535 million in federal grants to the company, which then goes under.
·
Obama, by edict and without any statutory
authority to do so, delays the employer mandate under Obamacare.
·
A sitting U.S. Senator (Menendez) of the
President’s own party, who expresses disapproval of Obama’s “legacy” deal with
Iran, is immediately indicted by the DOJ on complicated corruption charges that
will occupy the Senator’s time and attention for years.
·
The Administration takes TARP money (which
legally can be used only to rescue financial institutions), and uses it to bail
out GM, then appoints a “czar” to run GM for months without any authority to do
so.
If you are among the millions who read this blog regularly,
you know I am not a Trump fan. Though I
concede he possesses a peculiar genius that has put him atop the Republican
field, he remains a crude, dishonest person who is not only ignorant of things
a President needs to know (e.g., history, economics, the Constitution), but
also does not care that he is ignorant. (He
also is reputed to be a worse golf cheat than even Bill Clinton, though this
was previously believed to be scientifically impossible.) Finally, his policy positions, to the extent
one can figure out what they are, are those of an Eastern blue-state liberal
Republican, and I won’t vote for Eastern blue-state liberal Republicans
anymore. Mitt Romney was my last.
But while I don’t like Trump very much, the support for him
is easy to understand, and the dismissal of Trump’s supporters as yahoos is
insulting. It’s an attempt to belittle
Trump himself, I suppose, but it’s not merely unkind, it is foolish. While it
is true there are white supremacists and xenophobes among his voters, the vast
majority of them are rational, sensible people who support him for rational,
sensible reasons. Most know exactly the
sort of person he is, and they may like him about as much as I do, but they are
choosing to vote for him because they are frightened by what has happened in
America over the last eight years. Trump
is an inevitable response to the (partial) list of Obama’s illegal acts that
began this article, and to the unfortunate conclusion that law in America is
coming to be used merely as a tool to enforce leftist social policies, and not
as a bulwark of freedom and equal protection for individuals. As the rule of
law frays and begins to break down, the rise of a candidate like Trump becomes a
certainty.
The phenomenon happens everywhere, and is easier to see in
places where the process is much further along, where civil society has
completely failed. In a place like Libya
or Iraq or Syria, for example, when all semblance of law and government devolves
into looting and score-settling and civil war, what happens? What happens with the decent folks in quiet villages
when everything and everybody is suddenly at the mercy of roaming armies and
criminals and soldiers of fortune? What
happens to the people who have been raising families and growing crops and
running cafes and pouring concrete, and who now find themselves helpless
against the armed and violent forces all around them?
They look for tough guys to protect them.
People in such a place will get together and form a militia,
consisting of farmers and shop-keepers and young guys who don’t have anything
better to do, and they will set up a checkpoint at the edge of town in order to
keep the bad guys out. The message to
outsiders is far from complicated: “You
can’t steal these chickens. You can’t rape these women. You can’t
kidnap these children.” Where there
is fear, decent people turn to the “strongman.” In Libya, that may mean some local, friendly
guys with automatic weapons. In America
right now, it means voting for Trump.
The motivation is exactly the same.
And there is no one else on the Republican side who fits the
role. The party has held the House and
Senate throughout most of the Obama Administration, and despite campaign vows
to fight back against Obama’s autocratic rule, his spending and his disdain for
the law, virtually nothing has been done.
Historically, the House has often reined in a President of the other
party by refusing to appropriate funds for his initiatives (it’s how the
Democrats shut down the Vietnam War, for example), but this Congress refuses to
exercise its traditional “power of the purse.”
The Republicans in charge of Congress will not even stop the government
from funding the dismemberment of babies. The people voting for Trump are not
only frightened by the current government, they are disgusted with the
standard-brand Republican Party (McConnell, McCain, Ryan, Boehner, et al.), that
has betrayed them.
Voting for Trump is a perfectly rational response to both
the current government and the current Republican Party. While I do not agree that Trump is the
solution to the problem, and I don’t believe he will do what he says he will, I
understand the impulse to embrace him. The
options for those who want to save and rebuild the American republic are very
limited.
Copyright2016MichaelKubacki
No comments:
Post a Comment