For the 2015 season, the NFL has instituted a new PAT rule,
moving the line of scrimmage for an extra-point kick from the three-yard line
back to the fifteen. This is still well
within the range of any NFL kicker, but inevitably there will be more missed
kicks. In 2014, from the three-yard
line, extra-point tries were missed on 8 of 1230 attempts. Over 99% were successful. So far, in 2015, 727 of 768 have succeeded,
for a rate of 95%.
The rule for 2-point conversions has not been changed in
ways that will affect its success rate.
You still run a play from the two-yard-line, and you still have to get
the ball into the end zone. Since 1994,
when the two-point conversion became possible, the success rate has hovered
slightly below 50%. (Only four seasons
since 1994 have seen a success rate of 50% or higher.) This year so far, 31 of 65 attempts (48%)
have succeeded, which is virtually the same rate as the past 21 years.
The new PAT kick distance has changed the analysis on
whether to go for one or two. In the
past, with a .99+ rate, the expectation on a single extra point was .99 points
(1 x .99=.99). The expectation on a
two-point try, however, was only .96 points (2 x .48=.96). The kick had a better payoff, in other words,
so unless there was a strategic reason to go for two (e.g., you score a
touchdown when you are trailing by 8 or 11 or 15 or 22 points), you would kick
and take the certain one point.
Now the math favors going for two, unless there is a
strategic reason not to (e.g., you are down by six when you score a touchdown,
so the almost-certain single point puts you in the lead). The expected points in going for two are
still .96, but the expected points from kicking are now only .95.
(Note: the sample size for the new extra-point kick is
small, so we can’t make any definitive conclusions at present. Historical data from 33-yard field goals,
however, suggests that a 95% success rate on the new extra-point kick is higher
than it should be. This would mean that
the two-point try will be proven an even better choice than it appears to be
now. On the other hand, every
professional kicker is practicing the 33-yard kick much more than he used to,
so maybe they will soon be automatic.
For the purposes of this article, I am assuming the two-point try truly has,
and will continue to have, a slightly better payoff than the kick.)
Football, like many games, is a race to see which team can
score more points within a given period of time. This means that in the vast majority of
situations, the only driver of the decision to kick or run a play is the
expected number of points that will result.
Up until this year, the higher number of expected points (.99 points vs.
.96 points) came with the kick. That is
why two-point conversions were only 4% of the post-touchdown plays---this
option only made sense late in the game (or possibly as early as the 3rd
quarter), when the situational value of scoring two points was significantly higher than the
situational value of scoring an almost-certain one.
Now, however, the worm has turned. In 2015, there is rarely a reason to kick the
extra point because the rewards are greater when you go for two. But do NFL coaches do this? Of course not. Just as coaches properly chose to kick 96% of
the time in the past, the rule change means they should now go for two 96% of
the time. But they don’t. Instead of going for two 96% of the time,
they do it after only 8% of touchdowns.
Let’s simplify this so you will know what you are
watching. Since strategic reasons for
going for one or two only arise in the second half, there is never a reason now to kick an extra point in the first half of
an NFL game. When a coach chooses to
do so, he is making a mistake. It’s usually
not a huge mistake, of course, but it is an error, and some of us who are fans
are annoyed that these highly-compensated football coaches don’t take their
jobs more seriously.
I have mentioned before that while coaches of many sports
study how to play games (their game,
in particular), football coaches never do.
Football coaches are the kind of people who leave poker games wearing
only a barrel. They know the X’s and O’s
and how to design a play and they know what a middle linebacker looks like and,
in the NFL, they know how to manage fifty very large, very rich, very violent
men who have no manners. But the football
coaches who have ever won a game of Monopoly are the rare exception. They resemble military generals more than
anything else. This is why every NFL
owner needs to hire a twenty-year-old math geek (for $100 a game), and give him
absolute authority to make all the either/or decisions in the game.
“No, Mr. Harbaugh. I
know it’s 4th down, BUT YOU CAN’T PUNT in this situation.”
“No, Mr. Ryan, you MUST go for two here.”
“No, Mr. Kelly, you may not attempt this field goal. If you do, we will have you committed to an
institution for the criminally insane.”
Copyright2015MichaelKubacki
(NOTE: Another piece of the new conversion rule is that the
defense can score when the offense attempts a two-point conversion. If there is a fumble or an interception on
the conversion attempt, the defense can run it back and score two points, just
like in college. This also creates a new
type of score, the “conversion safety.” If
the offensive team goes for two and the defense gets a turnover, and the
defensive player tries to run the ball back but gets tackled in his own end
zone, the offensive team gets one point.
The conversion safety has never happened in the NFL, but there have been
a few in college games, most notably in the 2013 Fiesta Bowl.)
Posts
