Monday, November 4, 2024

OFTEN WRONG BUT NEVER UNCERTAIN

          I have gone both ways in my view of how this presidential election will play out, but now, with hours left until the polls open on November 5, I’m predicting Donald Trump will be inaugurated on January 20, 2025.  He’s going to win.

 

         The question for me has always been whether the Republicans would be able to overcome the margin of cheating. That Trump would get more real votes from people who were entitled to vote, at least in the seven critical swing states, was never an issue.  But since Democrats cheat in every election, without remorse, the two practical questions in a contest like this are: 1) will the margin be so large that the Democrats cannot alter the result in Harris’s favor? and 2) will the Republicans do enough to prevent the Democrats from stealing enough votes to win?

 

         As I have written over the past months, I am unimpressed with Republican efforts to fight the cheating.  Yes, they are spending money and time and effort.  And yes, they have hired a ton of lawyers.  Unfortunately, what they have done is reactive, and it has been reactive to the tricks the Democrats were playing in 2020.  The Republicans have largely failed to anticipate the problems they will face in this election.  Much like the Pentagon, the Republicans seem focused on winning the previous war, not this one.  They have brought a great deal of money and energy to this fight, but that’s not enough to win.  You need to be smart.

 

         But this time, the Republican failure to fight the cheaters may not be fatal.  This time, Kamala Harris is so weak a candidate that the Democrats will not be able to cheat enough to win.

 

         What tipped me here was a comment from a co-worker at my big-box store.  I had asked him who he thought would win, and he told me he had heard there were “a lot of people” who voted for Trump in 2020 but who were switching to Kamala now.  “Give me a name,” I said.  “Do you know anybody like that personally?”  Well, no, he told me, but he had two uncles who were deeply involved in local politics and they said there were a lot of such people.

 

         Whenever I hear this sort of thing, I ask myself if I know any actual person in that category.  Have I met them?  Do I know their name?  And if the answer is “no,” I realize I have learned something.

 

         In 2008, there must have been twenty people who told me Obama could not be elected because of all the people who wouldn’t vote for him because he is black.  I didn’t know any such people, of course.  I still don’t.  There were none.   Plenty of people didn’t vote for him because he was a Democrat or a commie or a secret Muslim or they didn’t want universal health care or they hated his wife, but the idea there were people who would vote for Mondale and Bill Clinton and Gore and Kerry but drew the line at a (shudder…) BLACK MAN made me realize there are embedded fantasies that warp people’s ability to examine reality and think clearly.

 

         The “they-voted-for-Trump-but-now-they’re-for-Kamala” meme is just such a fantasy, and the realization of how silly it was served the function of a cold slap in the face.  It returned me to reality-land.  A simple lesson, really---tear away all the goofy stuff and what is left is the truth.

 

         All of which brought me back to the point I made in my article on September 14.  In the last two elections, 137 million people voted to make Trump president and nobody voted for Harris.  

 

When I wrote that, there were six weeks left in the campaign and anything might have happened.  She might have made the country fall in love with her.  She might have given great speeches or connected with the electorate.  She did none of those things.  I understand this was the plan---to fight a substance-free campaign---but it doesn’t seem to have worked.  Trump was a substantial (about 8-5) favorite in the international wagering pools, and he remains in that position on the eve of the election.

 

Up until now, I have predicted Harris would win.  In fact, the only money I have on the election is on her.  But I’m switching horses.

 

Of course, though I pride myself on my rationality, maybe this is just my emotions having their way with me at the last minute.  Perhaps I’m just so frightened of yet another Obama/Biden/Harris administration that I don’t want to face the possibility that all the horrors I have seen the Democrats do recently will continue, or even get worse.  To wit:

 

Putting elderly Catholics in prison for praying at abortion clinics,

 

Allowing important politicians to enrich themselves through secret knowledge and insider trading opportunities they obtain in their official capacities,

 

Providing money to terrorists who murdered entire families in their homes, killed young people at a music festival and raped Jewish women to death,

 

Quietly conspiring with criminal cartels in the abduction and trafficking of 300,000 children into working or sexual slavery,

 

Closing churches for two years,

 

Funding rogue government scientists in the creation of a deadly virus in a Chinese lab,

 

Silencing those who dissent from positions taken by the government on COVID or the climate or the number of sexes by removing those people from public forums, getting their professional credentials lifted and destroying their careers,

 

Holding hundreds in solitary confinement, without bail, for vandalism at the US Capitol,

 

Forcing a deadly and untested “vaccine” (which didn’t prevent anyone from catching the disease), on millions of people, killing untold numbers of them through dozens of side effects, many of which have never been seen before,

 

Permitting and encouraging the lucrative business of chemical and surgical mutilation of children’s sexual organs and sexual development,

 

Encouraging men to compete in sports limited to girls and women,

 

Recruiting millions of mostly military-aged young men (many with criminal records) into the country, commandeering hotel rooms for them and supporting them with cash payments,

 

Stifling energy markets and forcing me to pay an extra $20 whenever I fill up my car,

 

         Using the DOJ to investigate parents who objected to their 5-year-olds being taught about anal sex and labeling those parents “domestic terrorists.”

 

         Employing the criminal justice powers of the government to prosecute and attempt to impoverish Donald Trump, the primary political figure opposed to them,

 

         Jailing, disbarring, and impoverishing attorneys (and others) working for Trump because they had questioned the results of the 2020 election,

 

         Killing large marine mammals (and birds), by planting thousands of windmills just offshore on the continental shelf,

 

         Printing billions of dollars not authorized by Congress to spend on their political priorities,

 

         Carelessly allowing American soldiers to be killed by the Taliban and allowing thousands of American citizens and allies to be trapped in Afghanistan after America’s abrupt exit.

 

I could go on.

 

Copyright2024MichaelKubacki

Saturday, October 26, 2024

ELECTION UPDATE 10-26-24

With ten days before the presidential election, the odds listed on Pinnacle.com, one of the world’s largest offshore betting sites, make Trump a 4-7 favorite to win the election, and Harris a 7-4 underdog.  Through most of September, Harris was favored.  Then, in late September and early October, the two were rated even.  Since then, Trump has slowly edged into favorite status.

 

         (I find the large international betting sites to be far more reliable than polls for predicting election results, though some polls are better than others.  With so many polls, it’s hard for a layman like me to distinguish the real polling efforts from the partisan ones designed to shape the results rather than report on them.  Also, even honest pollsters can be incompetent, so even if I were certain which polls were honest, I wouldn’t know which ones were done correctly.  Also, I find betting sites to be just plain more serious.  If they are wrong on the odds, a savvy bettor can take them for a lot of money, so it is safe to assume they at least want the truth and make genuine efforts to figure out what it is.)

 

         In other words, Trump appears likely to win this election.

 

         Because of that, and because of Harris’s steady drift downward, I have been expecting the Democrats to do something different, to change their strategy somehow.

 

         It’s not easy, of course.  Just as Trump is Trump, Harris and Walz are Harris and Walz, and the nature of the candidates are largely baked into the campaigns.  Nevertheless, though no major changes are possible, it is always possible to tweak the campaign slightly, even at this late date.  And I’ve been expecting the Democrats to do that.

 

         For one thing, I think it has been apparent for some time that the physical image of Kamala Harris does her no good.  The earth-tone pantsuits she wears on every occasion effectively turn her into the “Black Hillary,” and that comparison does not help her.  Her handlers have succeeded in getting her to stifle the annoying laugh (something Hillary never did), and that has helped somewhat, but the reminders of Hillary in Kamala’s wardrobe are unmistakable.

 

         Instead, they have apparently decided to double-down on the Trump-is-Hitler theme.  General John Kelly, who was Trump’s Chief of Staff in the White House in 2019, now reports that Trump once said he wished he had some of Hitler’s generals because they were so loyal and obedient.  These are the guys who repeatedly tried to murder Hitler, by the way, but I guess Trump is not expected to know any history.  Also, among students of military history, the German military command was never admired for their unthinking obedience, but rather for their independence and resourcefulness.  But I guess Trump is not expected to know that either.

 

         In any event, the Trump-is-Hitler theme won’t work.  It hasn’t worked and the Democrats have been throwing it at him since 2016.  If this is the best they can come up with to turn the tide, the Democrats may be cooked.  The evidence from polls and betting sites is increasing that Trump will get more votes than Harris in every swing state and may even win non-swing states like Virginia.  The desperation revealed in the return to the Trump-is-Hitler message tends to convince me the Democrats may be out of vote-getting strategies.

 

         Which doesn’t mean Trump will be our next President.

 

         The war over electoral fraud and cheating in the swing states is happening behind the scenes, it is waged differently from state to state, and almost nothing is being reported publicly about it.  Therefore, while I can tell you Trump will get more actual votes than Harris in Georgia and Michigan and Pennsylvania, I have no prediction to make on who will be declared the winner of those states on November 5 or December 2 or January 1 or whenever.

 

         The seven swing states are Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.  All except North Carolina ultimately went to Biden in 2020, but none of the Biden states had a declared victor on election night.

 

        As in 2020, the key metric for predicting shenanigans will be the date on which victory is declared for Trump or Harris, either by election officials or a major news organization.  If a state is “called” on November 5, the date of the election, there will likely be little controversy about it.  But once the sun comes up on November 6 with no official results, I personally will suspect the necessary Democratic ballots are being found in order to flip the result to Harris, because that is what happened four years ago.  The earliest any of these swing states were called was three days after the election.  Nevada was not decided until November 24th, with a ruling from the state’s Supreme Court.  And that seems to be what is happening again.

 

          Election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Nevada have already announced that they do not expect to be able to call a winner in the presidential race on election night.  Arizona reports that its Maricopa County will not have results until ten to thirteen days after the election.  (A tip to my betting public:  you can get better than 2-1 on Kamala winning Arizona.  Grab it.) 

 

           The one swing state I know something about is Pennsylvania, and I have no confidence the vote and the counting will be fair.  In fact, like last time, I’m convinced the Democrats in Philadelphia and Delaware County and in a few other places are already working to deliver sufficient fraudulent ballots to win Pennsylvania for Harris.  The Republicans have spent enormous amounts of time and money and effort in very publicly and noisily battling for honest counting on November 5 and beyond, but most of their work has focused on things (like proper dating and sealing of mail-in ballots) that will make no difference.

Copyright2024MichaelKubacki